Three places where the model has to fit.

Scenarios, not client stories: where a vision model meets a fixed board, and what we measure there.

01City cameras

More camera streams on the same box.

One edge box at a crossroads analyses several camera feeds. The model sets how many cameras each box serves, and so how many boxes a city buys.

Who brings us inBoard distributors and camera makers.

Threshold
Frame rate per stream, with all streams running
Floor
Detection accuracy on your scenes
You gain
More cameras per box, or a smaller box
Closest proof
As exported11 cameras
One app change16 cameras

Jetson Orin NX, YOLOX-Nano: 16 cameras per box at most instead of 11, at 30 fps assumed per camera, after one change in the application (no retraining).

Demonstration on public data (COCO val2017). An upper bound computed from the GPU latency, for this model alone, one image at a time; host-device copies, image decoding and NMS excluded.

02Inspection line

Classify every part before the next one arrives.

A classifier sorts good parts from defects on a conveyor. It is accurate in the lab, too slow on the line’s board, and a bigger board at every station is not an option.

Who brings us inVision software vendors and integrators.

Threshold
Time per part, below the line’s cadence
Floor
Accuracy on each defect class
You gain
Keep the board you already qualified
Closest proof
As exported0.850 ms
Optimized0.449 ms

Jetson Orin NX, ResNet-18 classifier: 0.850 → 0.449 ms.

See it block by block

Demonstration on public data (ImageNet). Latency measured on weights not yet retrained; accuracy known after retraining.

03On a battery

Vision on a battery.

A robot, a drone or a smart sensor carries its own chip. The chip is set by weight and power, not by the model.

Who brings us inChip and board makers.

Threshold
Latency from frame to decision on the module
Floor
Accuracy on the tasks that matter
Energy
Measured where the module allows it, otherwise marked not proven
You gain
A smaller, cheaper chip for the same task
Closest proof
Chipmaker’s model9.4 ms
Ours, same accuracy3.5 ms

STM32N6 microcontroller, person detection: 3.5 ms for our model against 9.4 ms for the chipmaker’s own model of the same size, at the same accuracy (44.2 vs 43.8 AP50).

Verify it yourself

ST Edge AI 4.0.1 · AP50 simulated on PC on 1,345 COCO val2017 person images · compared after evaluation.

Working with distributors and integrators.

Talk to us about a partner pilot
Board distributors
Your customers’ models, measured on your boards. A pilot you can offer, to pick the right board, sometimes a cheaper one. Demos in your lab.
Vision software vendors
Your models, faster on your customers’ hardware. A joint development, then a licence.
Integrators
The same offer, under your name. A co-signed report; the client stays yours.